Friggin' Commies

[piece-itpete]

Our Dear Leader is a direct threat to world security. Just something to consider.

Pete

[icenine]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

It was in response to you comparing the tea party (of which I'm no member) to that son of a bitch. Will you also stop posting like a moron?

I said I hope the tea party does not last 60 years.

where did I say they were as bad as Kim?

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

Just because he can't implement his communistic dreams doesn't make him less of one (he is doing his best).

And... and... and just because he hasn't even tried doesn't mean he won't! We all know he will. When we least expect it! He's so... so... shifty!

Why don't you answer the question.

The question of how the North Korean people will - or could - effect regime change? Well, I don't know. I doubt anyone here knows. The fact remains, such things do happen so if the will and the means present themselves, the North Korean people will act.

Now, a question for you. Your question seems to suggest that you believe that the North Koreans are powerless to reform their government and improve their lives. Does that mean you think we should do it for them?

John

[icenine]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

It was in response to you comparing the tea party (of which I'm no member) to that son of a bitch. Will you also stop posting like a moron?

And the tea party has not compared Obama to fascism and communism, like you just did earlier?

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

You mean like first saying he didn't have thee power to implement the dream act and then all of the sudden just doing it via executive order? You mean just deciding to ignore congress and refuse to enforce the defense of marriage act? You mean like make recess appointments when congress is not in recess (and subsequently getting slammed over it)?

The president doesn't wish he were king,, no he don't, he is a centrist 😏

This is communism how, exactly?

And you need to read up on these accusations you made. There are serious and fundamental errors in all of them.

John

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

No, China and Russia should. They created this mess.

What should they do?

John

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by mini me

So, I guess for anyone who needs clarification about what North Korea's newest "Dear Leader's" aspirations look like, here's a video that will help:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HKWJS...n4oVQ&index=14

Lest you think that this is a random video posted by some disgruntled North Korean with questionable animation skills, no so fast. The video posted under an account maintained by the DPRK.

http://www.businessinsider.com/north...a-video-2013-2

Move along. Move along. Nothing to see here.

"We have always been at war with Eastasia."

Focus on imaginary foreign enemies and rally nationalist enthusiasm by fantasizing about defeating them. It's a time honored tactic of totalitarians of all stripes, not only "commies".

John

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

You mean like first saying he didn't have thee power to implement the dream act and then all of the sudden just doing it via executive order? You mean just deciding to ignore congress and refuse to enforce the defense of marriage act? You mean like make recess appointments when congress is not in recess (and subsequently getting slammed over it)?

The president doesn't wish he were king,, no he don't, he is a centrist ��

Obviously, if he successfully implemented it, he had the power to.

I see nothing wrong with ignoring religion based bigotry.

When congress is in recess, do they play on the swing set? WEEEEE!

Regards,
Dave

[CarlV]

Hmm, just like the debt ceiling, it is just fine if the Republicans do it.

The elimination of intrasession appointments would have been particularly frustrating for George W. Bush, according to the report. He made an estimated 141 such appointments, compared with Obama's 26. From massive agencies like the Agriculture and Education departments to more obscure bodies like the Federal Maritime Commission and the Legal Services Corp., scores of Bush appointments apparently would have been invalid under Noel Canning.

Reagan, too, would have been severely hemmed in by the ruling. Reagan made an estimated 232 recess appointments, followed by George W. Bush with 171, Clinton with 139, George H.W. Bush with 78 and Obama with 32.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_2618902.html


Carl

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by baconshorts

You error if you think, i think GWB is much different from BHO.

Yes, GWB was a terrible president.

Regards,
Dave