Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Off-topic

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-26-2009, 07:11 AM
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,943
Death penalty

Yes or no. Where do you stand ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-26-2009, 07:56 AM
Sandy G Sandy G is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,354
Yes. Absolutely, on CERTAIN things...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-26-2009, 08:08 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Yes in principle, but we still have no definitive method of determining guilt.

Determining guilt or innocence is just to inexact science in the overwhelming majority of cases.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-26-2009, 08:25 AM
Combwork's Avatar
Combwork Combwork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
Subject to the following plus anomaly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
Yes or no. Where do you stand ?
I don't think there can be a simple yes or no answer; too many variables but if you mean do I have an absolute moral block on taking anyone's life, I would say no, but subject to all of the following.

I). Enough forensic evidence to of itself secure a conviction for a lesser crime.
2). Enough circumstantial evidence as above.
3). Full confession made in the presence of his/her lawyer. Any confession made without the
lawyer present to be unacceptable in Court.
4). Death penalty to be automatically commuted to life (meaning full life)
imprisonment. At any time, the 'criminal' can opt for voluntary euthanasia.

I think 4) is important. If innocent, would the accused take their own life or go for appeal after appeal after appeal, knowing that if/when it's successful, damages awarded would be considerable?

I know that like Liza's bucket the above has more than its fair share of holes, but it's the best I can do.

Anomaly? The state already does this, sometimes on a grand scale. When the U.S.A. and the U.K. bombed Baghdad, we were exacting capital punishment not just on its military, but on any innocent men, women or children who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. By and large, the people we were not punishing were the politicians. Whatever they were, they weren't stupid; most were long gone.

Last edited by Combwork; 12-26-2009 at 08:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-26-2009, 09:07 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
Yes in principle, but we still have no definitive method of determining guilt.

Determining guilt or innocence is just to inexact science in the overwhelming majority of cases.
Point well taken, Noon.

I never talked to a con who was guilty of what he was in jail for. Except for the kid who stole a pig. He was just too stupid to lie.

From my experiences, there's not too many innocents on death row. It ain't like watching "The Green Mile".

Bottom line is, I won't miss them.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-26-2009, 10:27 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
There's just no way to do it "right". We far too often execute people who are later proven innocent. (Chas, check out The Innocence Project.) Former Illinois Governor George Ryan, a Republican, placed a moratorium on executions in his state.

Even if we were somehow able to get it right every time, I have concerns about what it does to society as a whole to have officially sanctioned killing of other human beings. Frankly, I think it "models" a behavior that makes it more rather than less likely that others will commit murder.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-26-2009, 10:59 AM
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,943
Illinois was never a big "death penalty" state to begin with, so not exactly a good example.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-26-2009, 11:22 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Only for 100% proven child molesters.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-26-2009, 11:37 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grumpy View Post
Illinois was never a big "death penalty" state to begin with, so not exactly a good example.
Size doesn't matter.

The thing that got Ryan going was the realization that during the time he was governor 12 people had been executed, while 13 people on death row had been exonerated. That's enough to get anyone's attention - or anyone outside a couple of Texas governors.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-26-2009, 11:39 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Only for 100% proven child molesters.
I'd be for "life without" for those people but, once they're dead, "Oops! Sorry!" just doesn't cut it.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.