Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Off-topic

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-16-2017, 04:16 PM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Question for you all

I was following a thread recently where someone brought up basic human rights.

It occurres it me that in our society, we really do not have anything that might be considered basic human rights.

Of course we already know we do not have a right to health care or food. But do we really even have a right to unpolluted air to breath or unpoisoned water to drink? Corporate america regularly poisons both and there seems to be little concern over it. There are some pretty words about basic human rights in the constitution but they are regularly ignored by both citizens and authority figures alike so they don't mean much.

So I'm asking ya'll, do humans really have anything that can be defended as basic human rights, rights that apply to every human which are above question, Rights that apply whether one is wealthy or dirt poor, or is the term an oxymoron?

If there were such a thing as basic human rights, what would you envision them to be?
__________________
It occurs to me that republicans seem to view black, Mexican, LGBT, Muslims and poor people in the same light as Nazi Germans once viewed Jewish people. We must be vigilant that it goes no further.

Last edited by MrPots; 12-16-2017 at 04:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-16-2017, 04:23 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,857
http://www.un.org/en/universal-decla...-human-rights/
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-16-2017, 05:38 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,122
The UN list is a good list.

I always like to point out that the Declaration of Independence declares that 'all men,' in the sense of all persons it is usually said, are endowed with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The first two are a clear enough pair of minimums, while the third is more vague. But it has a libertarian ring. Happiness, after all, is generally judged a personal and subjective matter, so the Declaration seems to endorse an individualist perspective on life, with self-determined aims.

Rights as a practical matter are just what one's fellows are willing to support on your behalf. The cases where support was absent and rights were violated with impunity, or even widespread approval, are countless. And it may be noted that the Declaration of Independence is not the Constitution, and has no literal force of law. But when it comes to marshaling the support of one's fellow citizens, the familiar words of the Declaration are a potent help. And I think it pertinent that the Declaration says 'all men,' not 'all citizens.' The writ of the Constitution is held by some not to run to foreigners, or to places like Guantanamo or Abu Ghraib. But the Declaration does not recognize any such limits. Its language is universal.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-16-2017, 06:56 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,188
I'm kind of partial to FDR's 'Four Freedoms'.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Freedoms
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-16-2017, 09:06 PM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
OK, we have lists and documents, but what do they mean and how are they enforced.

DO we have a right to clean water?

Do we have a right to clean air?

Do we have a right to food?
__________________
It occurs to me that republicans seem to view black, Mexican, LGBT, Muslims and poor people in the same light as Nazi Germans once viewed Jewish people. We must be vigilant that it goes no further.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2017, 09:14 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,176
Evidently not!

Just look around and notice the starving, breath some polluted air or drink a glass of questionable water.

Silly it seems to even contemplate a world where we were the stewards for the next of what was given to us at birth. Care for our fellow man without a thought of payment.

Wanting to leave more, just not to take!


Barney
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-16-2017, 10:34 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,122
In our legal system, the pursuit of happiness is codified as the pursuit of money. Locke's phrase was 'life, liberty, and property.' Jefferson introduced a sort-of radical twist to it, but in practice we've pretty much done it Locke's way. You can have all the food you want, and a neighborhood with a good water system, up on a hill out of the smog. You just need money. All your other rights are dependent on that.
__________________
If you Love Liberty, you must Hate Trump!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-17-2017, 02:21 PM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
So there we have it.
__________________
It occurs to me that republicans seem to view black, Mexican, LGBT, Muslims and poor people in the same light as Nazi Germans once viewed Jewish people. We must be vigilant that it goes no further.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.