US "Switched Sides" in the War on Terror?

[whell]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Stuff your "inflammatory stuff", whell...it's new stinking bullshit on top of old stinking bullshit.

The above post courtesy of an absolute expert recycling old stinking bullshit.

[whell]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

I don't need these clowns to tell me what to think.

Dae

Of course not. For that you rely on Media Matters and Mother Jones.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

You do realize that "the Obama administration's early effort to blame the Benghazi attack on a protest against a crude anti-Muslim YouTube video" was way-out-deep-in-left-field-strange, and that repeating it and clinging to it for weeks after the attack invites speculation as to why the administration acted in such a peculiar manner.

You do realize that the administration has yet to advance a single cogent explanation as the why they clung to the BS video story.

BS. Both the State Department internal review and the bipartisan committee report, along with recent testimony by the CIA Deputy, all tell the same story. This report's only purpose is to try to keep the Benghazi witch-hunt alive. It seems to have succeeded with you.

Having worked overseas on projects for DoD, State and several intelligence agencies (and my son still does), I think the bigger news item would have been that there were, in fact, clear lines of communication (and no turf battles) between State, the CIA and DoD.

I used to think you were pretty bright for a doctrinaire conservative, Whell. You're sliding pretty quickly down the slippery slope of Baggerdom lately though.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by finnbow

It's funded in large measure by Richard Mellon Scaife.

And he is that same right wing a-hole who funded the big fiasco against Bill and Hillary. He is as credible as any other horse's arse.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by whell

You do realize that, at that time, Hillary and Obama ran foreign policy, not John McCain.

You do realize that "the Obama administration's early effort to blame the Benghazi attack on a protest against a crude anti-Muslim YouTube video" was way-out-deep-in-left-field-strange, and that repeating it and clinging to it for weeks after the attack invites speculation as to why the administration acted in such a peculiar manner.

You do realize that the administration has yet to advance a single cogent explanation as the why they clung to the BS video story.

What I do realize whell is that you have too much spare time om your hands and you will scramble about seeking anything critical of Obama regardless of the source. Anything sponsored by Scaife is immediately suspect given his record.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Reckon why those groups with enough strength to vie for power in most of the countries in the middle east are clearly populated by murderous sub-humans? As I'm writing this...I'm thinking, wait a second Ike, don't be so hard on the Arabs. No different in eastern Europe...witness the latest in Crimea and it's precursors in Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo. Then I thought...Africa? Asia? What about the slaughter of native peoples in the Americas...post Civil War USA.

So I went for a look and found a really good Wikipedia on ethnic cleansing. When you put it all together it sends a real message: Mankind is the missing link between apes and humans. (And it's a significant insult to apes.)

I saw this picture of the 1988 Halabja gas attack on the above wiki page:


My immediate emotional reaction was feeling really bad for the cat. Whenever I see photos of this sort of carnage I always feel way, way...way worse for the dead beasts and dead children. They're the only true innocents. Adults, whoever they are, whatever their standing, rich or poor, light skinned/dark skinned, extra eye fold/no extra eye fold, christian/muslim/hindu/wiccan... the adults, all of them always have some sort of card in the game.

Now there is a straight up honest post that I can agree with.

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

Reckon why those groups with enough strength to vie for power in most of the countries in the middle east are clearly populated by murderous sub-humans? As I'm writing this...I'm thinking, wait a second Ike, don't be so hard on the Arabs. No different in eastern Europe...witness the latest in Crimea and it's precursors in Croatia, Bosnia, Kosovo. Then I thought...Africa? Asia? What about the slaughter of native peoples in the Americas...post Civil War USA.

So I went for a look and found a really good Wikipedia on ethnic cleansing. When you put it all together it sends a real message: Mankind is the missing link between apes and humans. (And it's a significant insult to apes.)

I saw this picture of the 1988 Halabja gas attack on the above wiki page:


My immediate emotional reaction was feeling really bad for the cat. Whenever I see photos of this sort of carnage I always feel way, way...way worse for the dead beasts and dead children. They're the only true innocents. Adults, whoever they are, whatever their standing, rich or poor, light skinned/dark skinned, extra eye fold/no extra eye fold, christian/muslim/hindu/wiccan... the adults, all of them always have some sort of card in the game.

No wonder why Americans hated Saddam! He killed that cat!!! Bastard!
The people? Meh. They were probably just a bunch of libtards..........

Dave

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by Ike Bana

The "War on Terror" has been a bullshit lie since the first time the words "War on Terra" came spewing like chunks out of the shrub's festering piehole.

Stuff your "inflammatory stuff", whell...it's new stinking bullshit on top of old stinking bullshit.

I didn't see anything new, this was being said about a month after the attack.

New to you maybe because your media sources quell the truth.

[d-ray657]

It is appropriate that this was posted on the Politics forum because it is nothing but unadulterated partisanship. The Republicans still hope that they can ride this dead horse into the midterms.

Regards,

D-Ray

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by merrylander

What I do realize whell is that you have too much spare time om your hands and you will scramble about seeking anything critical of Obama regardless of the source. Anything sponsored by Scaife is immediately suspect given his record.

It doesn't take much to find inept material on the Obama Administration. The cup flowith over.