Pharmaceuticals are forced to cooperate

[noonereal]

This goes into effect over 10 years. This should have been in place from the start.

Can the cons here explain to me why GW put the Pharmaceutical companies ahead of the elderly in the first place?

It's good to have a president that puts the people first.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...topnews&sub=AR

[JJIII]

The following question applys to GW and anyone else:

Where does this fit into the Constitution?

[soundhound]

Originally Posted by JJIII

Where does this fit into the Constitution?

"We the people......to promote the general welfare......"

[soundhound]

Originally Posted by noonereal

explain to me why GW put the Pharmaceutical companies ahead of the elderly in the first place?

because the pharmaceutical complanies make much larger campaign contributions than the elderly do.

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by JJIII

The following question applys to GW and anyone else:

Where does this fit into the Constitution?

Since when has anyone paid attention to the Constitution?

[Sandy G]

Originally Posted by merrylander

Since when has anyone paid attention to the Constitution?

Boy, ain't THAT the truth !

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by JJIII

The following question applys to GW and anyone else:

Where does this fit into the Constitution?

So are you saying that the government should not negotiate price with it's suppliers?

[JJIII]

I'm saying that Federal government should have never been involved in health care in the first place.

[noonereal]

The story is about gaining concessions for a program that Bush put in place.

[JJIII]

Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Kennedy...it doesn't matter. IMO the Feds have no business being in the business.