Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-12-2011, 03:36 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter View Post
Now tell me how much did the democrat machine generate for Obama in 08? I think both sides ought to be out, but government itself ought to be restrained from expansion. Politicians ought be limited to a single term.
Listed under "20 for the Democrats".

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-12-2011, 10:38 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhunter View Post
Now tell me how much did the democrat machine generate for Obama in 08? I think both sides ought to be out, but government itself ought to be restrained from expansion. Politicians ought be limited to a single term.
Actually the Obama campaign was responsible for raising the vast majority of campaign funds. He was hugely successful in using the internet, not only to do fund raising, but to develop a grass roots - er, silicone roots - organization. He was not the first to use the internet for fundraising, but he used it in a way that changed the game.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-12-2011, 10:43 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Actually the Obama campaign was responsible for raising the vast majority of campaign funds. He was hugely successful in using the internet, not only to do fund raising, but to develop a grass roots - er, silicone roots - organization. He was not the first to use the internet for fundraising, but he used it in a way that changed the game.

Regards,

D-Ray
True dat.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:07 AM
bhunter's Avatar
bhunter bhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Listed under "20 for the Democrats".

Dave
I didn't see any union contributions in the article?
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:32 AM
bhunter's Avatar
bhunter bhunter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego California
Posts: 3,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Actually the Obama campaign was responsible for raising the vast majority of campaign funds. He was hugely successful in using the internet, not only to do fund raising, but to develop a grass roots - er, silicone roots - organization. He was not the first to use the internet for fundraising, but he used it in a way that changed the game.

Regards,

D-Ray



"We're setting the bar for a small donor as someone who gives $200 or less. The Federal Election Commission rules say that someone who gives this amount does not need to publicly disclose their name, address, occupation and employer.

In the general election, Obama got about 34 percent of his individual donations from small donors, people who gave $200 or less, according to a report from the Campaign Finance Institute. Another 23 percent of donations came from people who gave between $201 and $999, and another 42 percent from people who gave $1,000 or more.

His numbers for the primary were similar. He got about 30 percent of his money from donors who gave $200 or less. Another 28 percent of donations came from people who gave between $201 and $999, and 43 percent from people who gave $1,000 or more.

These numbers were compiled by the nonpartisan Campaign Finance Institute, and included in a report Reform in an Age of Networked Campaigns, which was published jointly with the Brookings Institution and the American Enterprise Institute."

http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...ge-donors-too/

I've wondered about how well the "grassroots" campaign was monitored. I would assume that for small donations there was no paper trail to where the donation came. By any measure, it's too damn much money for a campaign. Perhaps, limits ought be set for maximum expenditures on a campaign. Christ, that sounds like a recycled left wing idea. BTW, the campaign circus will be in full swing shortly.
__________________
Dear Optimist: Unless life gives you water and sugar too, your lemonade will suck.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-13-2011, 12:35 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Wow. Looks like it truly was a grassroots movement. As opposed to the tree top movement laid bare in the article I posted.

A million from Goldman Sachs? Yeah, I can see pointing that out, but-------that's ONE.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa

Last edited by BlueStreak; 03-13-2011 at 12:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-13-2011, 01:39 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Wow. Looks like it truly was a grassroots movement. As opposed to the tree top movement laid bare in the article I posted.

A million from Goldman Sachs? Yeah, I can see pointing that out, but-------that's ONE.

Dave
Goldman Sachs can afford to give a million dollars after all it's our money they are giving away.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-13-2011, 06:09 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Goldman Sachs can afford to give a million dollars after all it's our money they are giving away.
Right. And wasn't that done by Bu.............There I go again.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.