Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-24-2012, 11:37 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post

So, whell, as usual, you proceed from a false premise and then draw unwarranted conclusions from it. Very tedious.

John
So you reject the way the media handles election reporting. You'll need to take that up with the media outlets, which reference 2008 results to determine red / blue states.

For example:

http://www.britannica.com/blogs/2008...or-population/

Last edited by whell; 09-24-2012 at 11:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-24-2012, 11:51 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
So you reject the way the media handles election reporting. You'll need to take that up with the media outlets, which reference 2008 results to determine red / blue states.

For example:

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/...-electoral-map
Another distortion of reality, whell. The HuffPo chart shows current polling data, nothing more. Pennsylvania elects Republicans in statewide elections all the time as governors, senators, etc. Some of them, like Santorum, are way out on the Right Wing fringe. "Blue states" don't do that.

As I said in an earlier post, I have a lot of direct experience with and in Pennsylvania, having lived within 10 miles of it in two different states and having worked, shopped and recreated in it for most of my life. I suspect you have no such firsthand experience.

Only someone like you could take polling data showing Obama ahead in a poll and try to turn it into a negative. Keep lobbing your partisan turds, whell. It's the only thing you're good at.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-24-2012, 11:58 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Another distortion of reality, whell. The HuffPo chart shows current polling data, nothing more.
Yup, posted the wrong link. Fixed before you posted.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Only someone like you could take polling data showing Obama ahead in a poll and try to turn it into a negative. Keep lobbing your partisan turds, whell. It's the only thing you're good at.

John
Not at all. I'm good at laughing at you and your condescension. And you've given me a lot to laugh at lately. Please continue.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-24-2012, 12:01 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Cute. Changed the link to one that you hoped would make your point better.

It doesn't. It's only an election result for one year, the year of an Obama landslide where he carried all the swing states and quite a few red states.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-24-2012, 12:07 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Yup, posted the wrong link. Fixed before you posted.
If you fixed it before I posted then how could I have posted your old link? My Top Secret Liberal Time Machine?

Look at the time of your edit and the time of my post. Both are at 9:51 (my time zone). That means I had to have begun composing before your edit.

Quote:
Not at all. I'm good at laughing at you and your condescension. And you've given me a lot to laugh at lately.
That all you got? No response to my point?

Quote:
Please continue.
Oh, I intend to.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-24-2012, 01:40 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
What will the GOp do when Texas turns blue? Only a matter of time...
All of my ex's live in Texas...
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-24-2012, 02:09 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
If you fixed it before I posted then how could I have posted your old link? My Top Secret Liberal Time Machine?

Look at the time of your edit and the time of my post. Both are at 9:51 (my time zone). That means I had to have begun composing before your edit.
No, my contentious friend. It means that I recognized that I posted the wrong link, and your response post and my correction hit at the same time. Both hit the forum at 12:51 PM EST. How could I have posted the correction before your challenge post?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-24-2012, 02:10 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
That all you got? No response to my point?
Nothing much worth respond to.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-24-2012, 02:39 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
No, my contentious friend. It means that I recognized that I posted the wrong link, and your response post and my correction hit at the same time. Both hit the forum at 12:51 PM EST. How could I have posted the correction before your challenge post?
"Fixed before you posted."

Nuff sed.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-24-2012, 04:42 PM
62caddy 62caddy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 8
As a 48 year PA resident, I can vouch that PA is not easily categorized. On social issues, PA is mostly conservative except in large metro areas where it's more liberal. My hometown of Scranton is socially conservative but mostly democratic otherwise. Fiscal & social conservatives tend to suburban and rural areas. It's quite a hodgepodge we have here.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.