It's Official, Russians Corrupted The Election

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

From your link:

Meanwhile, major parts of the dossier have been verified by subsequent investigations into Russian election meddling, while others remain a mystery.

"Major parts of the dossier" have been verified, but even those taken at face value don't "prove" collusion. The Dems, the MSM, you and others on the other hand wanted to use the very existence of that "dossier" as prima facie "proof" of collusion, even though its origins were a bought and paid for political document.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

"Major parts of the dossier" have been verified, but even those taken at face value don't "prove" collusion. The Dems, the MSM, you and others on the other hand wanted to use the very existence of that "dossier" as prima facie "proof" of collusion, even though its origins were a bought and paid for political document.

You're the one who just lied about the veracity of the dossier, not me.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

From your link:

Meanwhile, major parts of the dossier have been verified by subsequent investigations into Russian election meddling, while others remain a mystery.

Oops. There he goes again, popping off without reading the article he cites.

[Chicks]

Russian contacts all over the place during Donny’s campaign. Why? Mueller needs a free hand to figure it all out, a lengthy and difficult process already, without the constant obstruction attempts by Donny and the Repubes.

Imagine the outrage from Faux “News” had the Hillary campaign been in contact with Russian operatives dozens of times. Whell, of course, would be hugely supportive of an investigation...

[Rajoo]

If one were to apply logic to this, the questions that pops up are these. Why the concerted attacks on Mueller and his team? Intent is assumed to be to discredit his findings and if so, why. There is only one answer, probable collusion.

Another question is why so many contacts with Russians by the Trump team leading up to the elections and afterwards? Only one possible answer, probable collusion.

Why did Flynn and Papadopoulos plead guilty for lying about their contacts with Russians? Probable collusion.

So who is delusional again?

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

You're the one who just lied about the veracity of the dossier, not me.

You're full of crap again, Finn. I lied about nothing. Rather, I gave an accurate and balanced view of the document. If you think being balanced is lying, you're in worse shape than I thought.

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Oops. There he goes again, popping off without reading the article he cites.

Oops, there he goes again. Posting and providing additional evidence that he has no idea what he's talking about.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Another question is why so many contacts with Russians by the Trump team leading up to the elections and afterwards? Only one possible answer, probable collusion.

Why did Flynn and Papadopoulos plead guilty for lying about their contacts with Russians? Probable collusion.

So who is delusional again?

There's "only one possible answer" if you proactively exclude other possibilities. If you must or want to exclude other possibilities, then yes, you might be delusional.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

There's "only one possible answer" if you proactively exclude other possibilities. If you must or want to exclude other possibilities, then yes, you might be delusional.

Name a few other possibilities if you can. I am game for a good laugh if you are.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

I lied about nothing.

You’re about as credible as Steve Bannon, who insists that Donny has never lied.

https://nypost.com/2018/06/17/bannon...has-ever-lied/

But then, you are probably dumb enough to believe Bannon.