It's Official, Russians Corrupted The Election

[ZeroJunk]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Aside from their flagrant gullibility, this has nothing to do with what Trump voters think, whether they do, or whether they can or will think rationally.

Sure it does . Same as how a supposedly rational person can overlook the destroyed emails, obvious Russian pay to play( or they gave the Clinton fund $150,000,000 out of the goodness of their heart) and Bill's meddling at the tarmac meeting.

[ZeroJunk]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Nah, I listen and read all sorts of shit. I'll watch a bit of Hannity and read some Breitbart and the Washington Times just to see what kind of silly shit people like Whell are lapping up. It makes it real easy to knock his softballs out of the park without even a full swing.

Even I can't take Hannity.

[bobabode]

You need to find some new material, Smoothie.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by ZeroJunk

Sure it does . Same as how a supposedly rational person can overlook the destroyed emails, obvious Russian pay to play( or they gave the Clinton fund $150,000,000 out of the goodness of their heart) and Bill's meddling at the tarmac meeting.

How is this the same.
Last I heard, Donald Trumps has lawyers.
Mike Pence has lawyers. Jeff Sessions probably too, or else he better get one.
Jared Kushner has a lawyer.
Donnie Junior, well he doesn't need one since he is going to defend himself with his bow and arrow.
Heck, last I heard even Hope Hicks got one.

The White House probably needs a wing just for all these lawyers.
Hope they know that they will all be stiffed in the end.

And Trump's lawyer is now claiming Finn to be Obama's guy.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by ZeroJunk

Even I can't take Hannity.

I only tune into Hannity for about 5 minutes 1-2 times a week, only when a Trump bombshell exploded that day to see what kind of complete BS the far right is peddling to cover for him. You only need to listen to 5 minutes because, like Rush, he repeats himself 10x through the show for his dimwitted viewers. It helps me understand the pablum Whell is going to write the next day.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

You apparently can't read, or fail to understand, what you post as support for your own comments. Yet you refer to folks who do understand as "simpletons" and "idiots." Maybe you should start your self-education by looking up the word "irony".

Actually, dickhead, I quoted what ABC originally reported. They corrected it later. My reading comprehension is far above yours, as your Dear Leader says, "believe me!"

https://www.axios.com/abc-corrects-b...514195655.html

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by nailer

In other words, whell's right and I was wrong.

Nope. Sorry to disappoint.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by Chicks

Nope. Sorry to disappoint.

Apparently you don't know the difference between during and after. I guess word definition isn't a part of proper English.

Maybe this post trail guide will help: 1104, 1105, 1109, 1110, 1113 and 1127 (an alt post).

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by nailer

Apparently you don't know the difference between during and after. I guess word definition isn't a part of proper English.

Maybe this post trail guide will help: 1104, 1105, 1109, 1110, 1113 and 1127 (an alt post).

What I don't understand is why you so often support an obvious idiot like Whell. Certainly doesn't improve your desired standing as "rational".

[nailer]

Originally Posted by Chicks

What I don't understand is why you so often support an obvious idiot like Whell. Certainly doesn't improve your desired standing as "rational".

Recognizing when someone is correct is rational.

You really need to learn how to use a dictionary. In addition to looking up during and before you might also check out often and rational.