Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Politics and the Environment
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-18-2014, 03:42 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,229
Obama's Decision on the KeystoneXL Pipeline Delayed Due to Litigation

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politi...#axzz2zGwgHWng

I hope this dumbassed idea of tar sands oil goes down in flames. We don't need this sh!t spilling onto some of our best croplands and possibly contaminating the Ogalala aquifer.
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-18-2014, 08:43 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
There is little environmental impact:

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...al-impact?lite

But setting that aside for the moment, its time for the prevaricator in chief to grow a set and make a decision, pro or con. There's no good reason not to. If the administration makes its decision it would either put pressure on the state to expedite its legal battle if the decision it pro, or help the state avoid the expense of a legal tussle if the decision is con. But the Prez had dragged this one out long enough to make it laughable.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2014, 08:47 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
There is little environmental impact:

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...al-impact?lite

But setting that aside for the moment, its time for the prevaricator in chief to grow a set and make a decision, pro or con. There's no good reason not to. If the administration makes its decision it would either put pressure on the state to expedite its legal battle if the decision it pro, or help the state avoid the expense of a legal tussle if the decision is con. But the Prez had dragged this one out long enough to make it laughable.
While I generally agree with building the pipeline, the Nebraska governor did exceed his authority, like it or not.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-19-2014, 09:46 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
While I generally agree with building the pipeline, the Nebraska governor did exceed his authority, like it or not.
I don't know enough about Nebraska law to comment on that one way or another.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-19-2014, 04:39 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I don't know enough about Nebraska law to comment on that one way or another.
In essence, he made a decision that was the responsibility of the State Planning Commission. The court said he overstepped his bounds and voided his decision.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:11 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
There is little environmental impact:

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news...al-impact?lite

But setting that aside for the moment, its time for the prevaricator in chief to grow a set and make a decision, pro or con. There's no good reason not to. If the administration makes its decision it would either put pressure on the state to expedite its legal battle if the decision it pro, or help the state avoid the expense of a legal tussle if the decision is con. But the Prez had dragged this one out long enough to make it laughable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Read what I wrote please:

"If the administration makes its decision it would either put pressure on the state to expedite its legal battle if the decision it pro, or help the state avoid the expense of a legal tussle if the decision is con."

In other words, if the decision its no, then no legal battle in Nebraska is required. The pipeline ain't coming in.
Oh, I read what you wrote. I'm still of the opinion that your party is only interested in a desperate search for any millstone they can find to attempt to gain them leverage in the upcoming midterms, particularly in light of the better than expected enrollment in the ACA.

Must suck to be a Repug considering the changing demographics in this country.
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2014, 08:49 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 37,229
You did note that there is ongoing litigation in Nebraska right? Sounds like you've changed your mind on the primacy of states rights v. Federal.

Could it be the Republican quiver is looking threadbare and empty for the upcoming mid terms?
__________________
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
- Mr. Underhill
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-19-2014, 09:46 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
You did note that there is ongoing litigation in Nebraska right? Sounds like you've changed your mind on the primacy of states rights v. Federal.

Could it be the Republican quiver is looking threadbare and empty for the upcoming mid terms?
Read what I wrote please:

"If the administration makes its decision it would either put pressure on the state to expedite its legal battle if the decision it pro, or help the state avoid the expense of a legal tussle if the decision is con."

In other words, if the decision its no, then no legal battle in Nebraska is required. The pipeline ain't coming in.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-18-2014, 09:52 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,213
It is a done deal IMO. The shame and blame will be on all of us by this act of selfishness.

Delay delay but unless society goes renewable the resources will be used.


Barney
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-18-2014, 10:10 PM
4-2-7 4-2-7 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets View Post
It is a done deal IMO. The shame and blame will be on all of us by this act of selfishness.

Delay delay but unless society goes renewable the resources will be used.


Barney
We need to use multiple sources of energy. With our needs and population it's the only way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.