Hate can bite you back

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie

I should add to my comments above that you're at least to some degree mischaracterizing the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act. Sure, it was enacted while Clinton was in office, but to paint it as a Clinton administration initiative is wrong. Maybe he should have vetoed it, but how much hell would he have gotten from the right if he had vetoed everything Congress tried to do? On second thought, watching the party of "no" right now, maybe that would have been a good strategy.

He signed it because Robert Rubin told him it was a good thing.