Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > The Auto industry
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:29 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
According to wiki only 17 states do bi-annual or annual smog checks.

So if you do not live in one ....nothing happens?
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:34 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
According to wiki only 17 states do bi-annual or annual smog checks.

So if you do not live in one ....nothing happens?
I doubt the Federal government will stand by and allow impacted vehicles in 33 states to continue to operate as is.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-24-2015, 11:45 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I doubt the Federal government will stand by and allow impacted vehicles in 33 states to continue to operate as is.
How would they do that?
Wouldn't emissions testing be a state matter?

Would new legislation be required?
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2015, 12:10 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
How would they do that?
Wouldn't emissions testing be a state matter?

Would new legislation be required?
The Fed has (or can get) the VIN numbers and compel/negotiate a required fix with VW. The Fed could use coercive measures (e.g., withholding highway or other funds) to force noncompliant states to get on board with the fix. Where's there's a will, there's a way.

Reuters reports that a top economic analyst says that the impact of the VW problem on the German economy may exceed that of the Greek economic collapse.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0RN27S20150923
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 09-24-2015 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-24-2015, 02:10 PM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
The Fed has (or can get) the VIN numbers and compel/negotiate a required fix with VW. The Fed could use coercive measures (e.g., withholding highway or other funds) to force noncompliant states to get on board with the fix. Where's there's a will, there's a way.

Reuters reports that a top economic analyst says that the impact of the VW problem on the German economy may exceed that of the Greek economic collapse.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0RN27S20150923
So if the cure is worse than the disease what will happen?
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-24-2015, 01:16 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
How would they do that?
Wouldn't emissions testing be a state matter?

Would new legislation be required?
Emissions and fuel consumption is a federal matter. In California, CARB has promulgated standards which are more stringent than the EPA standards. That's their right but, of course, it wouldn't be their right to impose lower standards and thereby find themselves out of compliance with the federal standards.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-24-2015, 01:31 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
How would they do that?
Wouldn't emissions testing be a state matter?

Would new legislation be required?
Ongoing testing of individual cars is a state matter but initial certification is federal. That means that, inherent in a state's testing regime, there is an assumption that the cars once met the federal standard. This is VW's problem. These TDs met the federal standard only by means of a subterfuge.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-24-2015, 02:09 PM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Ongoing testing of individual cars is a state matter but initial certification is federal. That means that, inherent in a state's testing regime, there is an assumption that the cars once met the federal standard. This is VW's problem. These TDs met the federal standard only by means of a subterfuge.
What about states not testing at all?

What if they do not want to test cars?

If you are not getting tested what happens?
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-24-2015, 03:29 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,919
If anybody is interested, here's the October 2014 paper from the International Council on Clean Transportation pointing out the differences between dynamometer testing and on-road testing of modern diesel engines. This is the report that got the ball rolling on the VW debacle.

http://www.theicct.org/sites/default...s_20141013.pdf

At the point this was published, the ICCT didn't know of VW's subterfuge, but subsequent investigation by California and the EPA brought the problems to light.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2015, 09:57 AM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 14,213
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
If anybody is interested, here's the October 2014 paper from the International Council on Clean Transportation pointing out the differences between dynamometer testing and on-road testing of modern diesel engines. This is the report that got the ball rolling on the VW debacle.

http://www.theicct.org/sites/default...s_20141013.pdf

At the point this was published, the ICCT didn't know of VW's subterfuge, but subsequent investigation by California and the EPA brought the problems to light.
Thank you for the link, quite interesting and informative. As usual there is never a catch all technology for prevention or cleanup with emissions. Only long term solution is electric cars.
__________________
White Christian Nationalism:
Freedom for us, order for everyone else, and violence for those who transgress.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.