Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Conspiracy theory corner

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #831  
Old 07-26-2018, 04:55 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
So, you have no backup for your own claim. Wouldn't it have been much easier to say that rather than to resort to name-calling?

Sheesh!
I provided ample backup for my claim. The issue is your unwillingness to believe anything critical of your Dear Leader. That's on you, not me.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #832  
Old 07-26-2018, 05:24 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I provided ample backup for my claim. The issue is your unwillingness to believe anything critical of your Dear Leader. That's on you, not me.
No, you didn't. You made the claim that Trump is "shredding the Constitution". I asked you to show me where a court has determined that this has happened. You posted articles which made allegations, and the Politico article you posted was from August 2016, months before he was even elected. The ACLU is a discussion of - as I predicted - "the Muslim ban" which is an issue that has already been settled in a manner favorable to the current administration.

So, I'll ask again. Show me where a court has determined that actions that the current administration has taken have "shredded the constitution".

For a competing perspective, there are some who have observed that there has been a reduction of regulation, which has the effect of promoting individual freedoms, which is more consistent supporting a constitution that was designed to limit the power of government.

https://www.industryweek.com/economy...behind-numbers

In the aggregate, the Trump administration is issuing fewer major regulations on manufacturers than that of the Obama administration, and it is seeking to eliminate or delay several major regulations on manufacturers that were issued by the Obama administration. (The difference from the Bush administration is less stark.) The number and cost of new major regulations on manufacturers is likely to remain low, and it is unlikely that the cost of compliance with long-standing regulations will be reduced significantly.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/01/u...ic-growth.html

Administration officials said last month that, since January 2017, federal agencies have delayed, withdrawn or made inactive nearly 1,600 planned regulatory actions. Further rollbacks will affect financial services as well as energy and labor rules, among others.

And Mr. Trump has appointed outspoken critics of regulation to lead several federal agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The evidence is weak that regulation actually reduces economic activity or that deregulation stimulates it. But business executives are largely convinced that the cost of complying with rules diverts money that could be invested elsewhere. And economists see a plausible connection between Mr. Trump’s determination to prune the federal rule book and the willingness of businesses to crank open their vaults.
Reply With Quote
  #833  
Old 07-26-2018, 06:01 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
You made the claim that Trump is "shredding the Constitution".
No, I didn't - you did. I said "Your idiotic Dear Leader is trying his damnedest to trash the Constitution." Fortunately for the country, he is mercifully incompetent in his dubious, misguided efforts.

And yes, his first two idiotic efforts at a Muslim ban (Rudy's words, BTW), were ruled unconstitutional by the courts. It took your beloved moron three tries to get a travel ban passed that survived legal scrutiny while accomplishing nothing to improve national security (No foreign-born terrorist from the seven countries included in President Trump's immigration restriction has been responsible for a lethal terrorist attack on American soil since 1975.) The only thing it did accomplish, however, was impress ignorant Trump cultists like you.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 07-26-2018 at 06:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #834  
Old 07-26-2018, 07:58 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
No, I didn't - you did. I said "Your idiotic Dear Leader is trying his damnedest to trash the Constitution." Fortunately for the country, he is mercifully incompetent in his dubious, misguided efforts.
Oh, good Lord. You can't even be honest with yourself.

For the last time: I asked you to provide examples where Trump has tried to "shred the Constitution", and you went back and found a Politico article that preceded his election, a ACLU piece on the "Muslim Ban" that wasn't, and that's already settled law, and another speculative piece. Not one example of actually "shredding the constitution."

Go lie to someone else who will buy your BS.
Reply With Quote
  #835  
Old 07-26-2018, 08:31 PM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Go lie to someone else who will buy your BS.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #836  
Old 07-26-2018, 08:34 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Oh, good Lord. You can't even be honest with yourself.

For the last time: I asked you to provide examples where Trump has tried to "shred the Constitution", and you went back and found a Politico article that preceded his election, a ACLU piece on the "Muslim Ban" that wasn't, and that's already settled law, and another speculative piece. Not one example of actually "shredding the constitution."

Go lie to someone else who will buy your BS.
I never said he shredded the constitution. I sad he's striving to do so, but is thankfully too incompetent. If you want to use his profound incompetence as somehow being proof of his respect for the rule of law, knock yourself out.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #837  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:28 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
I never said he shredded the constitution. I sad he's striving to do so, but is thankfully too incompetent. If you want to use his profound incompetence as somehow being proof of his respect for the rule of law, knock yourself out.
And yet I provided examples of exactly that. Here's another example:

The Left screamed foul last year when Trump ended the ACA's cost-sharing reduction payments to insurers that the Obama administration had been (illegally?) making, but were clearly not previously authorized by Congress. Ending them was the right thing to do if someone is at all interested in following the Constitution.

But you can keep dancing on the head of a pin if you want, Finn.
Reply With Quote
  #838  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:29 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
Chicklet - thanks for sharing your self portrait.
Reply With Quote
  #839  
Old 07-27-2018, 07:38 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
And yet I provided examples of exactly that...
You actually believe that your Dear Leader has respect for the rule of law? If so, you're an even bigger cultist and fool than I thought you were.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #840  
Old 07-27-2018, 09:04 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,286
Facebook also removes 4 Infowars videos, including one it previously cleared

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/faceb...071703333.html

InfoWars is the very definition of Fake News. You’d have to be as ignorant as Whell to believe anything they say. They should be banned entirely from Facebook and YouTube.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.