It's Official, Russians Corrupted The Election

[CarlV]

This from the GOP friendly The Hill:



Former CIA Director John Brennan and retired General Barry McCaffrey recently suggested that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin appears to have a strange hold over President Trump for unknown reasons, raising the possibility that Putin could be blackmailing Trump.

This concern is widely shared privately but rarely discussed publicly by serious, patriotic and nonpolitical national security professionals.

The latest leak brought the revelation that Trump was advised to not congratulate Putin on his victory in a fixed and sham election, and to confront Putin about his attacks against American democracy and recent attempts, which are widely believed to have been made by operatives working for Putin, to commit murder on British soil.



The most interesting question about the latest leak, involving Trump’s ill-fated conversation with Putin where he did the opposite of what he was advised to do, is whether the leaker will ultimately take public responsibility, warn the nation about why it was done and offer evidence to special counsel Robert Mueller who is investigating the Russian attacks against America.

It was reprehensible for Trump to congratulate Putin for his victory in the sham election, to refuse to condemn Putin for his attacks against America and the attempted murders in Britain and to spend so much time criticizing patriotic Americans and democratic allies.

The obvious question, which is widely discussed far more than citizens realize, is whether Trump’s praise for Putin and his refusal to criticize Putin suggest that he is being blackmailed by the Russian dictator.

The possibility of Russian blackmail against Trump was suggested in the famous Steele memo, written by former British spy Christopher Steele.

While some other allegations in the Steele memo detailing Russian attempts to influence the American election have been validated by revelations since the memo was written, other allegations, including the suggestion of blackmail, have not been been proven at this time.

Not all leaks are created equal. The leaks earlier in the Trump presidency were often committed by individuals widely believed to be close confidants of Trump leaking negative information against each other.

The most recent leaks are probably being committed for deeply patriotic reasons, by people close to Trump who are alarmed by the ominous facts surrounding his relationship with Putin.

Why does Trump often praise Putin while he simultaneously refuses to condemn him? I am not endorsing the blackmail theory, but it is certainly plausible. When figures as credible as former CIA Director Brennan and General McCaffrey publicly discuss this theory, it will deservedly generate major public discussion.

When some suggest that the special counsel should never have been appointed because there is no cause to believe a crime has been committed, the Mueller investigation of the famous Trump Tower meeting alone proves this assertion to be neither right nor credible.

Individuals acting on behalf of Russia requested a meeting with individuals close to Trump, for the explicit purpose, stated in writing, to provide negative information about Hillary Clinton, obtained by Russia, almost certainly illegally, to further the Russian plan to elect Trump.

The recipient of this request, Donald Trump Jr., expressed pleasure at this prospect. He forwarded the request to the president’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his son-in-law and close advisor, Jared Kushner, both of whom attended the meeting.

The president was later involved in preparing a false statement about the purpose of the meeting.
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...e-leaks-abound

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by CarlV

This from the GOP friendly The Hill:



Former CIA Director John Brennan and retired General Barry McCaffrey recently suggested that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin appears to have a strange hold over President Trump for unknown reasons, raising the possibility that Putin could be blackmailing Trump.

This concern is widely shared privately but rarely discussed publicly by serious, patriotic and nonpolitical national security professionals.

The latest leak brought the revelation that Trump was advised to not congratulate Putin on his victory in a fixed and sham election, and to confront Putin about his attacks against American democracy and recent attempts, which are widely believed to have been made by operatives working for Putin, to commit murder on British soil.



The most interesting question about the latest leak, involving Trump’s ill-fated conversation with Putin where he did the opposite of what he was advised to do, is whether the leaker will ultimately take public responsibility, warn the nation about why it was done and offer evidence to special counsel Robert Mueller who is investigating the Russian attacks against America.

It was reprehensible for Trump to congratulate Putin for his victory in the sham election, to refuse to condemn Putin for his attacks against America and the attempted murders in Britain and to spend so much time criticizing patriotic Americans and democratic allies.

The obvious question, which is widely discussed far more than citizens realize, is whether Trump’s praise for Putin and his refusal to criticize Putin suggest that he is being blackmailed by the Russian dictator.

The possibility of Russian blackmail against Trump was suggested in the famous Steele memo, written by former British spy Christopher Steele.

While some other allegations in the Steele memo detailing Russian attempts to influence the American election have been validated by revelations since the memo was written, other allegations, including the suggestion of blackmail, have not been been proven at this time.

Not all leaks are created equal. The leaks earlier in the Trump presidency were often committed by individuals widely believed to be close confidants of Trump leaking negative information against each other.

The most recent leaks are probably being committed for deeply patriotic reasons, by people close to Trump who are alarmed by the ominous facts surrounding his relationship with Putin.

Why does Trump often praise Putin while he simultaneously refuses to condemn him? I am not endorsing the blackmail theory, but it is certainly plausible. When figures as credible as former CIA Director Brennan and General McCaffrey publicly discuss this theory, it will deservedly generate major public discussion.

When some suggest that the special counsel should never have been appointed because there is no cause to believe a crime has been committed, the Mueller investigation of the famous Trump Tower meeting alone proves this assertion to be neither right nor credible.

Individuals acting on behalf of Russia requested a meeting with individuals close to Trump, for the explicit purpose, stated in writing, to provide negative information about Hillary Clinton, obtained by Russia, almost certainly illegally, to further the Russian plan to elect Trump.

The recipient of this request, Donald Trump Jr., expressed pleasure at this prospect. He forwarded the request to the president’s campaign manager, Paul Manafort, and his son-in-law and close advisor, Jared Kushner, both of whom attended the meeting.

The president was later involved in preparing a false statement about the purpose of the meeting.
http://thehill.com/opinion/white-hou...e-leaks-abound

Could it be that he genuinely admires Putin?

And the fact that he does not observe many "Made in Russia" products in the US puts Russia for him in real perspective.