Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
Tell me, if there is nothing there, why the conniptions over Mueller?
Why fire Comey? Why bitch over Jeff Sessions recusal?
Why the contradiction between the House and Senate reports?
Why did Flynn and Gates plead guilty?
Why do you keep insisting that there was no collusion and how do you know?
|
Covered most of this already in other threads and in some detail.
There are no "conniptions" over the Special Counsel, other than the existence of a Special Counsel is a constant source of distraction to any President. I've posted here - I believe in response to you - a reminder about how the Clintons dealt with Ken Starr and company. This is no different.
Comey would have been fired whether or not Trump had been elected. Sessions was an idiot to recuse himself, and he played right into the politics of the moment.
What "contradictions" are you referring to? Need specificity on that question.
You'd need to ask Flynn and Gates, though their plea deals do not have anything to do with "collusion". A similarly interesting question would be why Mueller has requested twice to delay Flynn's sentencing.
I keep insisting that there's no evidence of collusion because there isn't any. Could the investigation have found evidence and simply not yet have made such evidence public? Sure, but that seems very unlikely to me given the number of almost daily leaks that occur from ananymous sources.