You know it is going to be bad when your Presidential candidate attacks a porn star,

[sheltiedave]

and she is the one probably telling the truth!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/another-...al-misconduct/

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by sheltiedave

and she is the one probably telling the truth!

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/another-...al-misconduct/

10 to one, she is working for Trump.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

10 to one, she is working for Trump.

Pretty soon everyone will be working for Trump.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

10 to one, she is working for Trump.

I'd need better odds to take that bet.

[Wasillaguy]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Pretty soon everyone will be working for Trump.

And the U.S.S.R. will be open as vacationland for lawyers in love.

[whell]

I thought it was Republicans who were only interested in other people's sex lives and Democrats who just wanted to get on with the business of running the country. I guess that's not the case.

I suspect she ain't cheap, and that this latest turn for her in front of the cameras isn't pro bono work.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by whell

I thought it was Republicans who were only interested in other people's sex lives and Democrats who just wanted to get on with the business of running the country. I guess that's not the case.

I suspect she ain't cheap, and that this latest turn for her in front of the cameras isn't pro bono work.

So, whell, the fact that she's a porn star makes her fair game? Clearly you think her choice of profession disqualifies her.

What happens if Trump is elected and these allegations, from 11 women and growing, are still around and remain undebunked? Will the Republicans want to impeach him as they did Bill Clinton over allegations of marital infidelity?

What if the allegations of raping a 13 ear old girl go to trial. Will they want to impeach him then.

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by whell

I thought it was Republicans who were only interested in other people's sex lives and Democrats who just wanted to get on with the business of running the country. I guess that's not the case.

I suspect she ain't cheap, and that this latest turn for her in front of the cameras isn't pro bono work.

The government should not be interested in consensual sex. Sexual assault is a completely different matter, and you know it.

Are you insinuating that the Democrats are paying for women to come forward to describe their experiences? It sounds like you and Trump are on the same page. Bosom buddies so to speak.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

I thought it was Republicans who were only interested in other people's sex lives and Democrats who just wanted to get on with the business of running the country. I guess that's not the case.

I suspect she ain't cheap, and that this latest turn for her in front of the cameras isn't pro bono work.

Wow.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

I thought it was Republicans who were only interested in other people's sex lives and Democrats who just wanted to get on with the business of running the country. I guess that's not the case.

I suspect she ain't cheap, and that this latest turn for her in front of the cameras isn't pro bono work.

One's personal sex life and one's propensity to commit sexual assault are two different things altogether, Mr. Gingrich.