Thanks Politico...

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

What underground left-wing off-planet news source did you source that info from? I'm only asking because every single source that I've seen - left wing, right wing, centrist - demonstrates clearly that costs have were vastly under-estimated, and not by a small margin either.

Here http://politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=5797

and here http://www.latimes.com/business/mone...,2769699.story

Sure seems to be working out alright here in Washington, Oregon and California if you want something other than a single payer option. What are your sources?

[d-ray657]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

Forbes........

BAM!

Regards,

D-Ray

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

Forbes........

Oh, my lord!

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

BAM!

Regards,

D-Ray

Fixed that for you, Don....

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

Forbes........

Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha.............!

Dave

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Here http://politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=5797

and here http://www.latimes.com/business/mone...,2769699.story

Sure seems to be working out alright here in Washington, Oregon and California if you want something other than a single payer option. What are your sources?

Nope. The premiums for health insurance that an individual or small group policy has nothing to do with the cost that the Fed and / or the states will have to pick up to implement Obamacare. THAT is the cost that continues to rise, the cost that Harry Reid promised would come in at less than $1 trillion but won't.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

Nope. The premiums for health insurance that an individual or small group policy has nothing to do with the cost that the Fed and / or the states will have to pick up to implement Obamacare. THAT is the cost that continues to rise, the cost that Harry Reid promised would come in at less than $1 trillion but won't.

What is your source?

[barbara]

Originally Posted by whell

Nope. The premiums for health insurance that an individual or small group policy has nothing to do with the cost that the Fed and / or the states will have to pick up to implement Obamacare. THAT is the cost that continues to rise, the cost that Harry Reid promised would come in at less than $1 trillion but won't.

The states and the Feds already pick up that cost in the most inefficient and costly way possible. It's called Medicaid (medi cal in California).
Re directing that money to pay for health care up front with an emphasis in preventative care will save money.

[whell]

Originally Posted by barbara

The states and the Feds already pick up that cost in the most inefficient and costly way possible. It's called Medicaid (medi cal in California).
Re directing that money to pay for health care up front with an emphasis in preventative care will save money.

Except that's the exact opposite of what Obamacare actually does.

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

What is your source?

http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch...-will-cost-13t