Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politicalchat.org discussion boards > Conspiracy theory corner
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2009, 10:51 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by HatchetJack View Post
So with this mentality, the young lady who stopped the massacre at Fort
Hood and saved countless lives should not be hailed as a hero but praise
should instead be placed with the seller of the gun?



What on the planet are you trying to say?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2009, 12:30 PM
tincat tincat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post



What on the planet are you trying to say?
he's saying that if you can transfer responsibility for jfk's death to the supplier of the gun in that case, then you can just as well transfer responsibility(or kudos) for the stopping of the ft. hood nut to the supplier of the weapon used to do that job-legitimacy of the wielding agent's authorizations notwithstanding-
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2009, 01:17 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by tincat View Post
he's saying that if you can transfer responsibility for jfk's death to the supplier of the gun in that case, then you can just as well transfer responsibility(or kudos) for the stopping of the ft. hood nut to the supplier of the weapon used to do that job-legitimacy of the wielding agent's authorizations notwithstanding-
Thanks, I knew it didn't make any sense.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2009, 02:36 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
Thanks, I knew it didn't make any sense.
There are appropriate and inappropriate uses for guns, just as there are appropriate and inappropriate ways of obtaining them.

The law enforcement officer who performed so heroically at Ft. Hood is an example of both appropriate use and appropriate provenance. As a duly sworn officer of the law, she obtained her weapon legitimately and used it to protect the public welfare. Oswald, on the other hand, obtained his rifle in the most casual of ways and used it in the most heinous.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2009, 04:28 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
There are appropriate and inappropriate uses for guns, just as there are appropriate and inappropriate ways of obtaining them.

The law enforcement officer who performed so heroically at Ft. Hood is an example of both appropriate use and appropriate provenance. As a duly sworn officer of the law, she obtained her weapon legitimately and used it to protect the public welfare. Oswald, on the other hand, obtained his rifle in the most casual of ways and used it in the most heinous.

John
you are correct, sad thing is that it is so easy to legally get a gun for use in malice.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2009, 12:37 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
This thread may have new relevance

Discovery Channel is going to reveal new information about the assassination of JFK this Sunday. From what little I've been hearing it ought to be pretty interesting.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2009, 04:37 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
Discovery Channel
The Discovery Channel has turned away from a fact based shows in favor of higher rating shows on ghosts and crap. My guess is the is another UFO approach show. Hope not but I think this is one subject that has long been put to bed with facts and science.

It seems that all networks that start out as hard science wind up with dopey shows after a few years.

Cash cab, dirty jobs, Ghost Lab, American Loggers..........
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:56 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.