Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2018, 01:27 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
They are indeed and they were either untouched by this package or Trump promised to leave them untouched.
Untrue. Remember this from earlier in 2017. The House keeps kicking a budget deal down the road, so we've not gotten to the spending part yet.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...t-details.html

So, more to come on the spending side of the equation.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2018, 01:32 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Untrue. Remember this from earlier in 2017. The House keeps kicking a budget deal down the road, so we've not gotten to the spending part yet.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...t-details.html

So, more to come on the spending side of the equation.
Are you saying it is untrue that Trump promised not to touch Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare? Here are some facts, though facts might make your head explode.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...cuts-medicare/
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 01-12-2018 at 01:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2018, 04:14 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Are you saying it is untrue that Trump promised not to touch Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare? Here are some facts, though facts might make your head explode.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...cuts-medicare/
No, that's not what I'm saying. Of course you would know that if you looked at what I linked to. One does not have to mess with entitlements to reduce federal spending. Addressing the growth of entitlement spending should be looked at as well.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2018, 08:27 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
One does not have to mess with entitlements to reduce federal spending. Addressing the growth of entitlement spending should be looked at as well.
So, curtailing the growth of entitlement spending is not messing with entitlement spending? Who knew? I guess that makes perfect sense to the dying sparks of sputtering synapses inside your head.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2018, 08:46 AM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
It is pretty telling that as soon as the community organizer disappeared the economy took off. The only way around it is somewhere in the cloud of the lefty mind.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2018, 08:51 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 13,365
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroJunk View Post
It is pretty telling that as soon as the community organizer disappeared the economy took off. The only way around it is somewhere in the cloud of the lefty mind.
The economy has been doing quite well since Obama inherited the Republican caused meltdown. It has finally fully recovered, thanks to Obama era regulations on Wall Street causing a restoration of trust.
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2018, 10:33 AM
ZeroJunk ZeroJunk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,899
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks View Post
The economy has been doing quite well since Obama inherited the Republican caused meltdown. It has finally fully recovered, thanks to Obama era regulations on Wall Street causing a restoration of trust.
La La Land
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2018, 12:37 PM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
So, curtailing the growth of entitlement spending is not messing with entitlement spending? Who knew? I guess that makes perfect sense to the dying sparks of sputtering synapses inside your head.
So you're for unlimited growth in entitlement spending?
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-15-2018, 08:22 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,916
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
No, that's not what I'm saying. Of course you would know that if you looked at what I linked to. One does not have to mess with entitlements to reduce federal spending. Addressing the growth of entitlement spending should be looked at as well.
Ryan has long wanted to enact reforms to entitlement programs — which usually takes the form of cuts to Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security. But at an event in Wisconsin on Friday, he said entitlements wouldn't be addressed by Congress this year.

"I don’t see us tackling it this year," Ryan said.


https://www.aol.com/article/news/201...2018/23332196/
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.