Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2023, 09:25 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Does anyone find it remotely interesting that Charles McGonagal - the former FBI guy that was indicted for his work with the Russians - has hired Seth DuCharme as his defense counsel? I thought I'd seen DuCharme's name before, and it turns out that he and Durham previously worked together.

Don't know if this matters or not, and it's pure speculation, but one could theorize that maybe DuCharme has some thoughts about getting a plea deal for his client in exchange for certain information?
If he does cooperate, it likely will not be pretty for Trump in that McGonigal was in the employ of Oleg Deripaska, Paul Manafort's connection to Russian intelligence. Moreover, McGonigal may know details of some FBI folks in New York leaking shit to Rudy in the run-up to the 2016 election, thereby forcing Comey's hand to spill details of the Hillary investigation.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-30-2023, 11:29 AM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
If he does cooperate, it likely will not be pretty for Trump in that McGonigal was in the employ of Oleg Deripaska, Paul Manafort's connection to Russian intelligence. Moreover, McGonigal may know details of some FBI folks in New York leaking shit to Rudy in the run-up to the 2016 election, thereby forcing Comey's hand to spill details of the Hillary investigation.
And yet, Biden's business dealings with Chinese intel/Communist Party don't seem to trouble you at all.

Oh, yeah, and I know the media had Manafort tried and convicted for funneling secrets to Russian intelligence, though he was never legally accused or convicted of that.

No, I think McGonigal has a fair bit of knowledge about Russian and eastern European intel and financial players. Some of that may, or may not, help Durham connect some dots.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-30-2023, 11:50 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,920
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
And yet, Biden's business dealings with Chinese intel/Communist Party don't seem to trouble you at all.
You are reliable font of misinformation. I'm not aware of any illegal dealings that Biden had with China.

Quote:
Oh, yeah, and I know the media had Manafort tried and convicted for funneling secrets to Russian intelligence, though he was never legally accused or convicted of that.
It was clearly and unequivocally shown that Manafort cooperated with Russian intelligence assets.

Quote:
No, I think McGonigal has a fair bit of knowledge about Russian and eastern European intel and financial players. Some of that may, or may not, help Durham connect some dots.
Dunham's grand jury (and thereby the active component of his investigation) have closed up shop. He's writing a report now. In his investigation that has lasted years and spent millions, he connected exactly zero dots when it comes to criminal misconduct though he apparently ignored serious financial criminal misconduct by Trump in Italy (Clinesmith's noodling with a FISA warrant application was uncovered and provided to Durham by the DOE-IG.)
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-30-2023, 12:41 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
You are reliable font of misinformation. I'm not aware of any illegal dealings that Biden had with China.
I didn't use the word "illegal". Nothing "illegal" has been demonstrated. Nor has Manafort been accused of any business dealings that are "illegal".

But you don't seem at all concerned that the Biden family was courting representatives of CEFC China Energy for a business deal. What the Biden family business had to offer CEFC China Energy isn't really clear. But, that business had " layers of Communist Party committees across its subsidiaries – more than at many private Chinese companies."

Or, I remember you were all exercised about Trump's business' previous efforts to build a hotel in Moscow, and that was proof of Trump's contact with the Kremlin. But you don't seem the least bit alarmed that a member of the Biden family real estate business received $40MM from a noteworthy Russian oligarch who claimed that the funds were intended to help their business enter the US Market.

Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
It was clearly and unequivocally shown that Manafort cooperated with Russian intelligence assets.
Yup, the accusation was that Manafort gave polling data to one of his Russian buddies. The ONLY reason that this is relevant is that it feeds the discredited narrative that the Trump campaign "colluded" with Russian on the 2016 campaign.

Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Dunham's grand jury (and thereby the active component of his investigation) have closed up shop. He's writing a report now. In his investigation that has lasted years and spent millions, he connected exactly zero dots when it comes to criminal misconduct though he apparently ignored serious financial criminal misconduct by Trump in Italy (Clinesmith's noodling with a FISA warrant application was uncovered and provided to Durham by the DOE-IG.)
We'll see....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-30-2023, 01:26 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
It was clearly and unequivocally shown that Manafort cooperated with Russian intelligence assets.
Oh, I almost forgot: the "Russian asset" that Manafort was accused of working with was actually a key contact for the US State Department going all the way back to 2013. The Mueller report saw fit to overlook that little detail.

In a key finding of the Mueller report, Ukrainian businessman Konstantin Kilimnik, who worked for Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, is tied to Russian intelligence.

But hundreds of pages of government documents — which special counsel Robert Mueller possessed since 2018 — describe Kilimnik as a “sensitive” intelligence source for the U.S. State Department who informed on Ukrainian and Russian matters.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-16-2023, 03:46 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Does anyone find it remotely interesting that Charles McGonagal - the former FBI guy that was indicted for his work with the Russians - has hired Seth DuCharme as his defense counsel?
Nope? Not the least bit interesting.

You know you're not going to get the answer you want to your stupid question. So why waste your time asking the stupid question?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-16-2023, 03:59 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
Nope? Not the least bit interesting.

You know you're not going to get the answer you want to your stupid question. So why waste your time asking the stupid question?
Because I so enjoy getting responses from stupid people.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-16-2023, 06:39 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Because I so enjoy getting responses from stupid people.
I'm so crushed into dust...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-16-2023, 07:05 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ike Bana View Post
I'm so crushed into dust...
What's wrong with someone willing to say a thing like that in public? (I refer to whell's confession of what he so enjoys, not your reply....)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2023, 11:34 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,175
" Some of that may, or may not, help Durham connect some dots."

I think you are very confused about the subject and aims of Durham's 'investigation.'

On edit, 'confused' is the most charitable interpretation. One can be honestly confused. Or you may be heedlessly careless about the truth of what Durham is doing, or it may be even worse than that.

Last edited by donquixote99; 01-30-2023 at 12:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.