Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2011, 04:37 PM
Brother_Karl's Avatar
Brother_Karl Brother_Karl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: English Town
Posts: 245
Free Speech

Should free speech on corporate property be more limited than speech on public property? If it should, what kinds of limitations should there be? Should outdoor areas open to the public -which are nevertheless still corporate- be treated differently from, for example, small indoor confined spaces such as offices? How so?

Watch the below video for a few minutes from 1:20 to get an entertaining idea of what I am talking about ->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNscBk0n9lc

Who was right in the video? Is there a middle ground to be found? Is this kind of free speech covered in the Constitution? Should it be a human right? Was the police officer wrong to try and stop the megaphone guy from speaking in this particular situation?
__________________
"They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me."-Nathan Lee, Bedlam.

Last edited by Brother_Karl; 02-09-2011 at 04:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2011, 08:41 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother_Karl View Post
Should free speech on corporate property be more limited than speech on public property? If it should, what kinds of limitations should there be? Should outdoor areas open to the public -which are nevertheless still corporate- be treated differently from, for example, small indoor confined spaces such as offices? How so?

Watch the below video for a few minutes from 1:20 to get an entertaining idea of what I am talking about ->
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNscBk0n9lc

Who was right in the video? Is there a middle ground to be found? Is this kind of free speech covered in the Constitution? Should it be a human right? Was the police officer wrong to try and stop the megaphone guy from speaking in this particular situation?
The bald headed guy was right, he's a fucking loud mouth.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-17-2011, 09:09 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charles View Post
The bald headed guy was right, he's a fucking loud mouth.

Chas
But because he doesn't have corporate sponsorship he has to use a megaphone to be one, instead of the airwaves.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:09 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,919
Freedom of speech is about the right to express your ideas, not one's ability to be a loudmouth prick. This guy is a loudmouth prick and was disturbing the peace. Somebody should have shoved that thing down his throat.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:30 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Freedom of speech is about the right to express your ideas, not one's ability to be a loudmouth prick. This guy is a loudmouth prick and was disturbing the peace. Somebody should have shoved that thing down his throat.
There's some cops you wouldn't want to pull that shit on.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWNE54RJIL4

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2011, 04:21 PM
mossbacked's Avatar
mossbacked mossbacked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Freedom of speech is about the right to express your ideas, not one's ability to be a loudmouth prick. This guy is a loudmouth prick and was disturbing the peace. Somebody should have shoved that thing down his throat.
Exactly!

I'm sure shouting through a megaphone at 90 db in a public place where people are not there to listen to that particular speaker by choice was not contemplated when the First Amendment was drafted.

He could certainly wear a sign or express himself in his speaking voice. It's freedom to speak, not freedom to yell.
__________________
.
.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2011, 08:42 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossbacked View Post
Exactly!

I'm sure shouting through a megaphone at 90 db in a public place where people are not there to listen to that particular speaker by choice was not contemplated when the First Amendment was drafted.

He could certainly wear a sign or express himself in his speaking voice. It's freedom to speak, not freedom to yell.
I don't believe the First Amendment applies in England, correct me if I am wrong.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-09-2011, 09:17 PM
whell's Avatar
whell whell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
The internet provided novel ways for the least common denominators among us to have their 5 minutes of fame.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-10-2011, 12:21 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,407
Are all British cops that nice? You should see what happens when people smart off to the police here in "the Land of the Brave." Before you do---I hope your health insurance is paid up. You'll be needing it.

A friend once told me;
"If you want to learn the definition of asshole, just pin a badge on a redneck."

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-10-2011, 02:33 AM
Brother_Karl's Avatar
Brother_Karl Brother_Karl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: English Town
Posts: 245
So, the video aside, does everyone agree that on all corporate property (including such corporate property as the stone steps that megaphone guy was standing on) people shouldnt be entitled to the same free speech rights as they have on public property?

Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
This guy is a loudmouth prick and was disturbing the peace.
How so?
__________________
"They called me mad, and I called them mad, and damn them, they outvoted me."-Nathan Lee, Bedlam.

Last edited by Brother_Karl; 02-10-2011 at 02:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.