|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|
11-18-2010, 12:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
We're addressing two separate subjects: marginal or effective rates (you) versus taxes on W-2 earnings (me). You suggest my numbers are misleading by posting something unrelated. Interesting debate strategy...
|
Okay, I'm trying here. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "marginal" tax rates refer to the higest level of tax you pay. We have a graduated taxation system and the marginal tax rate applies to the highest level of taxes you pay. It is a number, as I understand it, that is much higer than your average tax rate. Your average tax rate, again, as I understand it, refers to the percentage of tax you pay on all your income- that is, at all the rates that apply to you up to and including the portion of your income on which you pay the marginal rate.
So, no, I have no idea what you mean when you simply say "taxes on W-2 earnings". That doesn't say anything. Do you mean averge tax rate? If so, you're making your case worse as I'm reasonably certain that your 44% fiugre is speaking to a marginal rate. No way anyone is paying 44% on ALL their W-2 earnings.
Try this:
http://www.dinkytown.net/java/TaxMargin.html
If you are single, no dependents and make $1M a year (pretty sure that's none of us) you *still* only pay 32.4% average tax rate on W-2 income, putting nothing in an IRA, nothing in a 401k and with NO DEDUCTIONS AT ALL. I can't figure out a way to make more of a "worst case scenario" as I'm almost sure that would be virtually no one in the United States.
So, yes, please tell me where I'm doing anything but giving you the most favorable counter to your argument. If you are talking about average tax rates your figures are even MORE misleading than I made them out to be.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Last edited by Fast_Eddie; 11-18-2010 at 12:59 PM.
|
11-18-2010, 01:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
|
|
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
|
11-18-2010, 01:06 PM
|
|
Resident octogenarian
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete
Ford's a great example. HE made something that people wanted, not his customers, and he (kinda) invented a new way to do it too. And changed the world to boot.
If poor folks drive the economy, Obama's doing a great job!
Pete
|
The U.S. Economy was 75% consumer driven. The top 1% beggared the consumer and wages did not keep up with inflation. So what really happened is that all those smart-ass businessmen shot themselve in the foot.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
|
11-18-2010, 01:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Current Highest Federal income tax rate = 35%
FICA Tax = 6.2%
Medicare Tax = 1.45%
Total tax on income - 42.65
|
Let's try this, because I think I now understand what you mean. A hypothetical example. You believe there is an American, let's call him Rube, who has a sallary of $275,000 a year. If I follow you, you believe that Rube had deducted from his check, or pays at tax time a total of 275,000 * 42.65%. Right? You think Rube pays the government $117,287 a year?
Using the IRS Calculator for our friend Rube "Your anticipated income tax is $72,781" again assuming NO deductions, single, no contributions to tax deferred... etc. Again, NO ONE does that. Zero people. But even with that, 72,781/275,000= 26.4%.
Is there some Tea Party propoganda that leads you to believe this? If so, I can see why they're so angy. They think people are paying insane amounts of tax, almost higher than anyone in the world!
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
|
11-18-2010, 01:26 PM
|
|
Reformed Know-Nothing
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 25,907
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie
Let's try this, because I think I now understand what you mean. A hypothetical example. You believe there is an American, let's call him Rube, who has a sallary of $275,000 a year. If I follow you, you believe that Rube had deducted from his check, or pays at tax time a total of 275,000 * 42.65%. Right? You think Rube pays the government $117,287 a year?
Using the IRS Calculator for our friend Rube "Your anticipated income tax is $72,781" again assuming NO deductions, single, no contributions to tax deferred... etc. Again, NO ONE does that. Zero people. But even with that, 72,781/275,000= 26.4%.
|
Damn you, Eddie, with all your fact-based arguments!
You shouldn't let truth get in the way of indulging in a good fantasy.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
|
11-18-2010, 01:28 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Damn you, Eddie, with all your fact-based arguments!
You shouldn't let truth get in the way of indulging in a good fantasy.
|
Man, I'm pretty sure that's what he meant. No wonder he thinks taxes are too high. I'd be marching on Washington myself if I paid 40% of my income in taxes.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
|
11-18-2010, 01:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
Changing the definition midstream. Interesting debate tactic.
Regards,
D-Ray
|
I know you're not suggesting here that taxable income is the same as W-2 income. "Taxable income" can be derived from a number of sources. W-2 income = wages. I was pretty clear about what I was referring to: W-2 income. Why try to make this into something its not?
|
11-18-2010, 02:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,016
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie
Let's try this, because I think I now understand what you mean. A hypothetical example. You believe there is an American, let's call him Rube, who has a sallary of $275,000 a year. If I follow you, you believe that Rube had deducted from his check, or pays at tax time a total of 275,000 * 42.65%. Right? You think Rube pays the government $117,287 a year?
Using the IRS Calculator for our friend Rube "Your anticipated income tax is $72,781" again assuming NO deductions, single, no contributions to tax deferred... etc. Again, NO ONE does that. Zero people. But even with that, 72,781/275,000= 26.4%.
Is there some Tea Party propoganda that leads you to believe this? If so, I can see why they're so angy. They think people are paying insane amounts of tax, almost higher than anyone in the world!
|
If you want to try calculating it with actual wages, the 35% tax bracket starts with income earned above $373650/yr. And yes, individuals do earn and are taxed on income at that level. Also, the increased Medicare withholding on wages/investment income starts in 2013, so that may be why you're not finding it in 2010 tax calculation data.
|
11-18-2010, 02:05 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
|
|
(edited- even THOSE numbers weren't right)
Estimated Federal tax with no itimized deductions etc. $105,331. $6,621 max for SS. 1.45% for Medicare is $5,417.
105,331 + 6,621 + 5,417 = 117,369
117,369/373,650 = 31.4%
Where's the 42.65%?
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Last edited by Fast_Eddie; 11-18-2010 at 02:43 PM.
|
11-18-2010, 02:08 PM
|
|
Possibly admin. Maybe ;)
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,098
|
|
Is this apples to apples, country to country, are we talking total taxation to total taxation - we have state county and local taxes as well.
I'd like to see that.
Pete
__________________
“How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg.”
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.
|