Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
This is becoming tiresome. The default in this forum of late is to not discuss ideas or debate legitimately. Look at this post as an example of what happens when lack of dialogue gets completely out of control. Is this really the best we can do?
If you're interested at all, here's a balanced overview of how the CRA created the environment - and lead to the the politics - that contributed to the meltdown in 2008.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-c...s-guide-2009-6
There are some good points here, and plenty of blame to go around. The "Bush did it" or the "Clinton did it" crowds can each find their own fodder, but if you only focus on one side, you'll miss the essential facts.
|
Debate legitimately? You think Zero has ever made a single fucking attempt to debate anything legitimately. My post contained a legitimate challenge to the FOX/EIB crap that Zero keeps dumping all over this forum. So OK fine, let's get to it.
The only conclusion this article come to is right in the first paragraph.
Quote:
... the evidence is overwhelming that the CRA played a significant role in creating lax lending standards that fueled the housing bubble.
|
So the CRA played a role in generating the housing bubble. Who says it didn't? Pay fucking attention because it wasn't me.
But you have gone beyond what this article has suggested when you pitch the bullshit that the CRA generated the meltdown of 2008.
The subprime loan paper did not cause the meltdown. What the vampire investment bankers did with the subprime paper caused the meltdown. Their derivative products, and how Standard and Poor's and Moody's gave A ratings to Lehman's bundles full of D paper, is what caused the meltdown.
And here's the proof. On the day that Lehman Bros died...yes, the forclosure rate on home mortgages reached a point where it had doubled from the typical level. Doubled from 1% to 2% of all US home mortgages. ONE PERCENT TO TWO FUCKING PERCENT.
The day Lehman closed up shop 98% of US mortgages were still solvent. Housing bubble my ass. The meltdown didn't happen when the housing bubble popped. The meltdown happened when Lehman (and Bear Stearns before them) couldn't cover the all the money they leveraged in order to buy all that subprime D paper that went into their products. Way before the housing bubble burst. In fact, the housing bubble burst because of the meltdown...it was not the cause of the meltdown.
The meltdown happened because the investment bankers didn't want to spend any of their capital to build their derivative products. The CRA had nothing directly to do with the meltdown...it was the bankers leveraged at 40 to 1 or more.
Learn something. It's easy reading...go read "The Big Short." If that's too much work for you go to the fucking library and get the DVD and fucking learn something.