Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657
I think it is really a question of state law. Section 1303 only comes into play in those states where state law requires that medical coverage include coverage for abortions. In those states, the segregation is necessary in order to create a plan that complies with both state and federal law. The money can't come from the feds, so it has to come from somewhere - and that would be from the fund participants.
Regards,
D-Ray
|
That is how I read it too. But, how is it decided which fund participants have to pay and which don't? I think that is the question that is causing hte uproar. Am I missing something? Is this defined within the text of the act?
Mushy minds want to know.