Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion
The linked article is drenched with politics.
One should adopt a skeptical approach to data re Covid.
|
The writer is a 'business columnist,' not a straight reporter. Such writers have license to flavor their work with expressions of opinion, such as calling a reliably wrong pundit 'reliably wrong.' He gave an example of the pundit's wrongness. Was he objectively wrong in doing so? Or with anything else he said? Unless you can give us actual reasons to not trust him, I'm sticking with 'sounds reasonable to me.'
Denouncing the thing 'on principle' leaves you open to possibly ignoring the fact that he's basically right.