Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
Maybe. But RS has already put a semi "Mea culpa" on their web site accompanying the article which seems to side-step the issue of the "glam" photo.
RS has done some excellent journalistic work over the years, but they've also had a history of pursuing magazine covers that elicit a "reaction" from their readers. I guess they shouldn't be too surprised when they get a reaction from some that is negative.
|
What magazine doesn't try to elicit a reaction from their readers with provocative cover photos?
Isn't that the whole point of a cover photo, to attract attention?
Come on, now.
Dave