Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
Both cases had to do with the servers'/owners' beliefs.
|
OK, but one belief involves disapproval of private persons doing something perfectly legal and the other involves disapproval of a public official constantly lying in support of illegal and vile practices (unconstitutional Muslim ban, revoking due process from asylum-seekers, illegal campaign contributions via porn star payoffs, self-dealing through charitable foundation ...).
In short, SHS wasn't denied service due to her beliefs/views, she was denied service due to her actions (constant lying while on the public payroll in defense of illegal activities). Half of our country seems OK with the Trump administration's constant lying and have helped normalize and excuse it. This restaurant owner belongs to the other (righteous) half.