Quote:
Originally Posted by whell
If the facts presented are in dispute - such as the assertion that the hacks were "directed by the Kremlin", then of course you can argue with the facts. When something is published as a fact by a publication as august as the New York Times...ahem... but is not substantiated, then it is fake news.
|
The intelligence community is not disputing that this was directed by the Kremlin. In fact, they said exactly that in a formal release on October 7. What's fake is John Bolton's (under consideration for Trump's Deputy SoS, BTW)
assertion that this was a false flag operation, possibly orchestrated by the Obama administration. You seem perfectly content to have Bolton and Michael Flynn spewing demonstrably ridiculous and false shit like this while complaining that the NYTimes correctly reported the nature of the CIA's intelligence assessment.
You're really ought to just give up on your silly misdirection and projection when it comes to fake news. You obviously have no idea what it is and you sound more unhinged and idiotic (i.e., like Tom Joad) with every post.
Quote:
|
Do we really need to rehash this? They weren't just running against Trump, they were running against one of their own - Bernie Sanders. They knew they weren't supposed to pick sides, but they did. Karma's a bitch.
|
Bernie was never one of their own. He was a registered Independent. Regardless, your apparent position that the DNC's actions vis-a-vis Bernie somehow justify Russia's actions is as ridiculous as it is traitorous.