Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks
Read the scientific consensus, bucko.
|
News flash: "consensus" ain't science, bucko.
There's "consensus" that there was a "big bang" that started the universe as we know it. Yet, there are scientific questions that remain that are unexplained by the "big bang" theory. There are credible scientists who postulate different theories: everything from a universe made up of vibrating strings of 11 dimensions, to an idea that the big bang wasn't a static event and is continuing to occur.
Those scientists dissenting from the prevailing big bang theory aren't derided like those that question anthropomorphic global warming. Why? Probably because no one has determined the need to attach a political agenda to big bang theory....yet.
But none of this is relevant anyway. I'm still trying to understand your logic about how disagreement about climate change causes prevent you from having a discussion.