|
This article can't be serious. The has been no "Obama Budget", hasn't been for a while now. Even his own party voted overwhelmingly against his last budget submission, so it was DOA. For fiscal 2013 the article suggest that spending is scheduled to fall, but that's due to the sequester, which both parties are gearing up to negotiate about how to avoid. Also, the Stimulus was passed by Obama, but the article suggests that the responsibility for that is assigned to the last fiscal year of Bush's presidency, so it "doesn't count" against Obama's spending?
Gimme a break, please.
|