|
FinnBow:
I'm not really buying that it's the same-0.. I must not have been following Camp David and the peace attempts for the past 30 years or my ears haven't been working..
Let's try some logic.
1) If you START with 1967 borders as an initial condition --- Then
2) In order to swap for anything, Israel has to give UP acreage that it held prior to 1967.
3) The end result being that Israel loses land it held prior to 1967.
NEVER was in the cards previously.. You'd have to give me concrete examples...
What parts of pre-67 Israel were EVER on the table in serious negotiations other than "joint use" travel corridors that amounted to road access?
Last edited by flacaltenn; 05-23-2011 at 11:50 AM.
|