[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Really? I'm still waiting for anyone to post any information - other than semantics - that is contrary to the reporting that an FBI informant was used to gain information from inside the Trump campaign.

I was first told that the idea that the suggestion there was such an informant was a "conspiracy theory". I was then told that the story was "debunked", which was nothing more than an exaggeration of a CNN article and an extension of the game of semantics. But of course, I'm a moron because I don't want to play the game of semantics.

And, as if to reinforce the point, here you come telling me that I'm incapable of a "reasonable discussion", while you suggest I'm "drinking Kool-Aid" and defending an "attack on democracy". Sheesh!

You are the one who posted that the "FBI set up Papadopolous" by placing someone "inside the campaign." Neither are true (and you're the one playing semantics trying to cover for your bogus OP).