Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad
I don't care what anybody says, due to dramatic increases in worker productivity we have a surplus of labor.
Uh Yeah. I guess that we have fewer jobs and international outsourcing has nothing to do with fewer jobs. I would bet worker productivity is as high as ever.
Robotics is going to make this surplus even more acute.
You have no clue about what you speak. I worked robotics for a few companies. It is generally very expensive and very job specific. Most of the time robotics doesn't not justify the cost. I am talking true robotics, not automation.
It's a wet dream for employers because they can dictate the terms of employment they want and the poor desperate for a job masses have to eat whatever shit sandwich they are offered.
Agreed, unfortunately
The way I see it we have two options.
One is to create a shitload of non-jobs with the government.
The other is to pay people not to work, like we pay farmers not to grow shit in order to avoid surpluses.
I favor paying people not to work.
That's what I see the guaranteed income to be.
|
see red above
__________________
Instead of a debate, how about a discussion? I want to learn, I don't care about winning.
|