Trudeau Tatoo'd by Me Too
 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/canada-wo...18.html?bcmt=1

Trudeau groped her in 2000. He must have been, what, like 5 at the time?

That's Canada's problem. Trump is our problem, though that doesn't serve your desires for misdirection, equivalency and projection.

Woman Allegedly Groped By Justin Trudeau Breaks Her Silence https://n.pr/2NwQiTI

You did notice that this was the "Global Discussion" section of the forum, right? Its not the "Finn wants to change the subject of every thread to Trump" section. :rolleyes:

So, the socalled leader of the free world isn't a player on the world stage? I can see why you don't want anyone to talk about your *resident Pussy Grabber, Mike. I'd be embarrassed too if I had to defend a crook like Derp Donald.

Pretty lame attempt to defend a case of deflection and false equivalence. There you go again applying different standards to different forum members. :rolleyes:

Once again, you resort to lies when called out. Sure must suck to be you Mike.

In other words, there's nothing worthy of discussion here other than Whell's desire to somehow extricate Trump from his sexual assault and campaign finance problems at the expense of Trudeau. Fail.

What's my "lie', Bobby?

Let's see....

I opened a threat on the "Global" forum about Justin T getting grabby with a(nother?) woman. That's no lie, since he's apologized for it.

Finn then attempted to change the subject (deflection?) to Trump. Apparently, just by posting about a topic other than Trump is a "deflection" in Finn's tiny little world.

I responded by calling Finn on trying to change the subject. That's no lie. Its exactly what he was trying to do.

You then showed up and defended the attempt to change the subject. You've also chastised me in previous threads for employing such "logical fallacies", and suggested that you and Don had worked so hard to get me not to use them. Yet, here you are in this thread being - again - hypocritical. I pointed that out. Its no lie. Its fact.

So, color me confused. Where did I "lie", Bobster?

Nah. What's failing is your desire to employ a false equivalence in this thread.

Love this article:

https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/7...gation-scandal

Justin Trudeau’s attempt to build a political brand on the premise that he is the only non-shitty man ever to live has finally crashed up against the rocks of actual reality. We all make mistakes: sexism has its hooks deep inside all of us. But you also have to own your past ethical failures if you are going to appoint yourself the Grand Inquisitor of sexual harassment. He expelled two MPs from caucus in 2014 at the first hint of sexual impropriety, and routinely justified shooting first and questioning later as the only appropriate response to such allegations from truly committed feminists. Of course, it turns out now that this standard apparently applies to everyone but the prime minister.

Trudeau would be well advised not to wear a heavy crown unless his spine is strong enough to support it. Otherwise, it will start to appear to others that he was always more concerned with a branding exercise than a substantive commitment to justice.

But since you brought it up, Finn:

It always cracks me up that, as public a figure as Trump was, he was never labelled a racist, homophobic or misogynist until he ran for office. Yet those labels are used almost generically by the left when discussing their political opponents. Some of you have attempted to attach those labels to me, yet you know nothing at all about me.

You accuse me of "deflection" in this thread, but isn't that exactly what you're doing trying to change the topic to Trump? Some would cast that as a tacit defense of Trudeau's actions. But not me... :rolleyes:

What??? Never heard of the Central Park Five? Birtherism? Or him and his dad settling with DOJ for racial discrimination in housing? How about him bragging to Howard Stern about all of his sexual conquests?

Most people didn't pay attention to your Dear Leader until he hit the campaign trail at which time his racism and misogyny were out front for all to see. If you're trying to claim that Trump is not a racist or misogynist, I guess that means that you're unable to discern what these traits actually look like in real life.:confused:

"Birtherism" is only racist if you want to make it racist. Sure, "racism" was a popular way to label folks who challenged Obama's failure to document his birth. Part of that was on Obama, who let that line of discussion go on longer than it needed to.

Now, let's apply your screwed up line of thinking to all of these companies, who have settled claims of race or sex bias with the Feds:

- Dr Pepper Snapple Group will pay $18.3 million in an age discrimination lawsuit judgment. Better not buy any beverages from them, Finn, 'cuz they apparently hate old people.

- Sears will pay $5.2 million in a race discrimination lawsuit judgment. Better not buy anything from Sears, Finn. Oh, wait, no one else does either, so I guess it won't matter.

- Pepsi will pay $3.13 million to settle an EEOC race discrimination lawsuit. "Summer Time is Pepsi Time", Finn, unless you're not white.

- Cook County (Chicago, IL) will pay $7.6 million in a race discrimination lawsuit judgment. I thought the Dems ran Cook County. Oh, well. I guess their racist too. Boycott Chicago.

- D.C. Department of Parks and Recreation (Washington, DC) will pay $3.5 million in a sexual harassment lawsuit judgment. I thought the Dems ran DC? Oh well. Guess you've got to boycott DC now.

- Rite Aid will pay $3.5 million in a disability discrimination lawsuit judgment. I guess you need to be a CVS customer now.

Are all of these entities truly racist, sexist, whatever? Or did they determine it was more expedient to settle. We'll never know. But if we employ your skewed standards, then they're all racist, sexist, whatever and need to be avoided, boycotted, publicly shamed, whatever. Sad, 'cuz Chicago's pretty nice this time of year. :cool:

Bullshit. Trump has been a very public figure for many, many years. You and your fellow travelers are simply engaged in a "branding exercise". That's why you responded to this thread the way to did, calling it a "deflection". You didn't want a scenario where Trudeau might diminish the "brand" that you want to apply to Trump.

""Birtherism" is only racist if you want to make it racist."

Anyone who actually believes that has lost touch with reality altogether and is totally immersed in ideological narratives.

The irony of a Trump cultist like you accusing someone else of engaging in a branding exercise must be lost on you. You must have forgotten about Low Energy Jeb, Little Marco, Lyin' Ted Cruz, Crooked Hillary or Low IQ Maxine. :rolleyes:

You truly are a disingenuous and deluded fool.

Pfftt. Like "branding" political opponents was something originated by Trump. :rolleyes:

Take it up with your fellow Democrat Andy Martin. :rolleyes:

You're the one who brought it up in an attempt to criticize me, without a whiff of irony.:confused: I'm beginning to think that you, like your Dear Leader, get your news from Fox & Friends.

"Without a whiff of irony" it's your sorry ass that continues to insist that this thread is about anything other than Trudeau. But watching your ongoing effort at deflection is hilarious.

You so often claim to be extremely amused here. Why don't you sound less sour?

If you want me to sound more sour, folks might start mistaking me for you. :rolleyes:

Perhaps because there is no there there, unlike with your Dear Leader and his over a dozen accusations of sexual assault, not to mention his paying off porn stars and playboy bunnies and then recently hiring a known enabler of a serial sexual predator (Bill Shine). Your attempt to deflect from your Dear Leader's immorality and unfitness for office is a major fail and now you're all whiny about it. Sad.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Dhc_pzQU0AA4mpo.jpg:small

Your rubber-glue defense took you away from the truth. Hardly unusual for you, of course. But again, my question was: why don't you sound less sour?

Maybe what happened was this: I blew off your question because I don't accept your premise. If you think I sound "sour", maybe you need to look in the mirror and figure out why YOU are attributing "sourness" where none exists.

I'd say a better adjective for you would be whiny...and disingenuous.

Still trying to make this thread about Trump, huh? You go, boy! :rolleyes:

And you continue to reduce the discussion to the level of the least common denominator by calling folks names when your attempts at deflection fall flat. You're priceless. Please keep it up.

Do you actually think that you're clever enough that your lame attempts at distraction and projection aren't transparent?:confused:

You should be proud. Name calling is your master Donny’s favorite tactic.

You are absolutely priceless. I post a thread about Trudeau. You apparently didn't like it because the thread wasn't about Trump. So, YOU change the subject and start talking about Trump in this thread, and then you accuse me of deflection for posting about Trudeau.

You must have learned a lot for George Orwell. :rolleyes:

...and yours. :rolleyes:

You're a big enough Trump cultist to believe that the point of my response was to defend Trudeau's behavior at a concert (where the alleged "victim" doesn't seem to care) rather than criticizing you for your shopworn tactics of deflection and projection in the defense of your Dear Leader?

This is akin to your recent posts in which you criticize those protesting Trump's racism and fascist tendencies as being the actual fascists and racists. You're a tool, and a whiny, disingenuous one at that.

Didn't say you were "defending" anything. Why do you keep running around suggesting that any comment is a "defense" of something?

All I did was point out, and correctly so, that you tried to change to topic and discuss Trump in a thread about Trudeau. YOU also accused me of deflecting by merely posting something about the accusation against Trudeau.

I think you've tried to spin this thread so hard that you've gotten yourself dizzy.

Womp, womp. You're almost as whiny as your Dear Leader.