9/11 conspiracy nuts
 

For those who believe that the one jet couldn't have crashed in the field, here is a video explaining why there was no noticable hole.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWdcVo6zIYI

Okay, now explain why there was such a small hole and no wreckage at the Pentagon. ;)

John

[EDIT] Well, now that I've watched the video it might explain what happened at the Pentagon but it hasn't anything to do with a plane going down in a field.

Did the jet in PA 'crash' or were the people on board trying to keep it airborne but were unable to do so. There is a big difference between a large jet going in at a dive (Flight 418 north of Montreal) and going in as a gliding angle (craash back in the 70 at Malton near Toronto).

I don't remember whether we ever learned if the passengers were trying to save the plane or crash it but didn't the hijackers kill the pilots? I do remember that the plane went nearly straight in.

John

All three 9/11 planes were traveling faster than the video jet. Atomization is going to occur either way. The planes were reduced to dust on impact.

Well, the 747 is the fastest jetliner. It cruises at 550 mph, not a lot faster than the plane in the video but do you actually know how fast the three 0/11 jets were traveling on impact?

Also, atomization depends on many other factors, including what the plane hits and at what angle. The WTC isn't the same as a massive concrete block mounted on shock absorbers. Neither is a field.

John